![ies ve revit 2017 plug in ies ve revit 2017 plug in](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0926580518309282-gr7.jpg)
![ies ve revit 2017 plug in ies ve revit 2017 plug in](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/C0Jbr-38z8k/maxresdefault.jpg)
Copied and pasted sketch from holes into a slab for new infill. Copied and pasted sketch from holes into a slab to demo.ģ. After I inherited this project in phase 3, I got tired of the filled regions that had been done on previous phases, so I decided to do it the way Revit would want (as my best stab):Ģ. Of course, these trenches have to be filled in in the new phase work. We have 4 phases (so far), and two of them involve cutting out trenches in the slab on grade to run new underfloor plumbing lines. In an existing building shell, each phase is essentially a tenant finish package, but all by the same owner - a company that is building labs. I have been working on a multi-phase project which tests the limits of some of these issues a little further. This option looks correct in an exiting view and shows a demolished floor in section, but dashed lines are lacking in the demo plan which would require the Linework tool, perhaps.ĭan - Thanks for this post, although I'm tagging on a little late here.
![ies ve revit 2017 plug in ies ve revit 2017 plug in](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/G0684G02l7o/hqdefault.jpg)
This option is a family which mainly contains a void I also added lines which can be toggled on and off to make it easy to see/select when need (see last image). Revit Ideas: Please take a moment and vote for this Revit Idea to fix the phasing issues around openings: Ability to phase wall openings (demolishing in new phase) Void family a New Construction element still shows up in an existing view, meaning the hole incorrectly persists in all phases. It even has phase parameters as shown in the penultimate iamge below. Using Revit's shaft element seems like the logical choice. However, the demo plans do not show a dashed line indicating something need to happen. But we do not often have existing plans in our drawings. But the existing does not look exactly right, as the perimeter of the area to be demolished still appears. However, adding another floor within this area and setting that filler element to be demolished is easy. In the plans and sections below, you can see Edit Boundary knows no boundaries when it comes to phasing. The three main ways of adding a hole in an otherwise monolithic existing floor is: I hope a few readers will comment on what they do. This post will quickly cover the various options one might try. The result should be something like adding a new door in an existing wall in existing views there is no hole in the wall, or any sign of the area to be removed. Need to demolish a portion of existing floor in Revit? It is not as easy as it should be.